Tuesday, 21 April 2026

Sack the teacher, not the smartphone.

 It's been many years since I have posted anything on here. It seems that e-learning simply gets interpreted as those training courses you do online nowadays. Everything in the classroom or involving teaching at schools and other institutions automatically includes using information technology in all its forms and there's little need to have any separate advice on what equipment to use and where to find it.

I am still annoyed at how many places insist on providing expensive Apple devices but there is a heartening number still promoting Chromebooks and sticking to the Android route so the battles continue as, I guess, they ever will.

The big difference now is the use of AI, not just by students in creating essays or that's simply what is the default response to a web enquiry, by by teachers and, indeed, everyone I meet. I am quite surprised, at first, by how readily everyone takes the AI results as gospel but then I think about this a little more and realise that, before the AI results, I tended to believe whatever Google told me when seeking advice on something. I think that was because it wasn't 'Google' telling me but whoever had authored the particular text being referred to on a website. That gave me some degree of faith, or lack of it, when you could see who was writing whatever it was. Some authors and sites you learned to trust. Others you treated with more than a little caution. AI's responses, however, just hit you and have a certain take it or leave it quality which can be disconcerting, especially when I am pretty sure they're wrong. Nevertheless the ability of AI to conjure up a story, image, video or a whole website, summarise a whole book in minutes is stunning and, I have to admit, ruddy useful.

I did ask AI to create of website for one of my businesses, Corgi Toys. It's first creation was a fascinating site promoting toys for corgi dogs! Wonderfully clever with all sorts of straplines, interesting and memorable phrases and attractive options for themes and logos etc. The fact that my Corgi Toys business is all about die-cast model cars and trucks from the 1956 to 1970s era meant that wasn't quite what I wanted but I had to smile at AI's first efforts.

I am now reading how almost everyone in teaching and politics wants to ban smartphones at school, with talk of special metal bags, locked spaces and all sorts of other rather restrictive methods to be adopted to prevent a student from utilising what I recall as being promoted as a tremendously useful learning tool when I was last here.

Nowadays, a smartphone is often the only way that people view the web, to the extent that we have all had to find ways to make websites look right on those thin vertical screens as well as those ancient people still viewing sites on landscape monitors. OK, that was a bit extreme and, of course, the laptops are everywhere at schools and colleges and there will, no doubt, remain rooms full of PCs, monitors and keyboards too. As far as I can tell, it is not the smartphone itself that is causing so much dismay and grinding of teeth amongst anyone over 20 but what the kids are using them for. So what's new? Since the dawn of being able to find naughty pictures or football matches or games of all sorts on computers, students have been sneakily going to places they shouldn't in classrooms, lectures or offices. They were just as able to send messages and pictures of this and that, usually that. I admit that videos are much simpler with a smartphone so, yes, there are a lot more of them floating around and AI makes all of this either more amusing or more appalling or both.

Basically, now that just about every student or employee has a smartphone the teachers and bosses want them to stop using them while at work or study. So why not just tell them that? If that's the rule then that's what children, or adults too, for that matter, need to obey. Staff, teachers, managers at all the places concerned just need to have some authority and expect that when they ask someone to do or not to do something then they'll have a reasonable chance of success. We do not need some new set of quasi legal instructions from the Department of Education to enforce this. We just need better teachers, managers and adults generally. And parents who bring up children to respect teachers and managers and what they're told.

I happen to believe that in many instances there is a lot of sense in using the amazing resources available on a smartphone in learning or completing tasks in an office. Yes, of course, it will be tempting to check mail, messages and whichever app is popular at the time and this has to be discouraged. I wouldn't ban a student from looking at a message if their work was progressing well. Where I do draw the line is in offensive material being shared, others being disturbed, by phone noises or vibration or the content itself and the general disruption that letting people be free to do as they please can create. And my students would know about the various lines. Cross them and they're out with whatever punishment one is allowed to inflict these days. Certainly something can be thought up which both complies with HR wokeness and serves as suitable deterrent to messing with my rules. Yes, take away the device! Of course, that's the obvious one. But leave those using theirs responsibly to get on with whatever they're doing. Reward respect. Treating everyone as some sort of purveyor of porn or bad egg in one way or another is simply not right. It may be convenient and teachers may think it provides a route to an easier life in the classroom if the whole school bans the damn things but it merely displays how little we trust teachers and managers now to have any control over those they are supposed to guide and direct.

What are we showing these people by way of how to behave? Assume they are all delinquent and incapable of listening to advice, warnings or obeying rules. Treat everyone as if they are the lowest common denominator of common misbehaviour or downright criminality. No, I fear for where this leads. If a teacher cannot control the use of a device n a classroom for 45 minutes then they need to be retrained. Or sacked.


Thursday, 29 May 2014

Diversity rules: only Sri Lankan girls with one leg can apply for this job


Google seem to be apologising for the lack of 'diversity' in their staff. In the same article they quote just 18% of Computer Science degrees being awarded to women and considerably smaller percentages go to Blacks and Hispanics. Now, I appreciate that it isn't just people with Computer Science degrees that Google are looking for but it would seem a reasonable guess that they are generally looking for people with good qualifications in related fields.

The figures are as they are, unless I am missing something, because that's who managers have decided best meet the various criteria for appointment across the whole range of posts. Fewer women and people from certain races apply in the first place or have suitable qualifications. Google should not now decide that, to reflect the population, they have somehow to recruit women in a higher proportion. How can you explain to a chap who is, in all other respects determined by managers to be the best candidate, that he didn't get the job because, er, sorry, we needed a woman.

The same argument applies to trying to develop a workforce that has, say, the same proportion of Indian people as some sample population. What do you do if you have more Indians than you need? Next we'll be bringing back the Only White Need Apply lines in advertisements!

The population is as it is for a whole bundle of reasons and the make-up of an organisation's workforce is as it is for a whole other bundle of reasons. Those bundles will not be the same and no amount of social engineering is going to make any difference. Leave this alone. Provided that managers are, indeed, being truly unbiased and the whole process of recruitment and appointment is fair, that is all we should seek. 

I sometimes think that too much is made of the differences between people, especially in colour or race. Why don't we simply stop recording who comes from where? Ignore it. Just judge people for who they are and how they perform. End of story. Clearly, at least I think it is clearly, the difference between men and women will continue to be there for all to see and figures are bound to be maintained in some way or another. But I wouldn't be able to tell the difference between Black African and West Indian, or Indian and Pakistani or, for that matter, White British and White American or however they're denominated these days.

Instead of trying to shove their workforce into some shape reflected by statistics, let them just recruit who's best. This diversity thing is getting out of hand.


Wednesday, 28 August 2013

At last! OFSTED really don't insist on intricate lesson plans and institution-approved forms.

After all the years of running around getting approved paperwork together just to show Inspectors, it is nice to see OFSTED pointedly remarking that they do not expect to see Lesson Plans in their guide.

There are several other sensible changes to the regime that staff may wish to bring managers' attention to - in case they are still insisting on this and that because that's what OFSTED want.

More about this here and, of course, make good use of some web tools!

The OFSTED site itself is pretty helpful too.

Ross Morrison McGill's blog also makes the point that there will now be a whole new range of CPD for staff in December! This, he suggests, would be a suitable cover illustration for the notes.


I am glad to have retired but may even consider doing some part-time work again now, which I definitely would not have down a year ago. And part-timers always miss CPD and training sessions anyway so I should escape them too. 

Of course, if anyone would like some sessions delivered by someone slightly less Grim Reaper-ish just ask. I am available December too and even earlier if you'd like to catch staff while they're enthusiastic.






Wednesday, 6 February 2013

Obfuscation


Clearly I am reaching the limits of either Serif WebPlus' or my old pc's capabilities but that's not why I'm posting this screenshot. I have written before about Greenshot and if I were to ever find a piece of software that tells me which programs I use most often other than operating system things then Greenshot would be up there in the Top 10.

Firstly, getting this as an image was simplicity in itself. You just hit the Print Screen button and up comes a grid that you drag around an area of the screen to save. I wasn't terribly accurate with this one and, yes, I could have used alt+Print Screen and then pasted it into an image editor in this particular case but most times I just want a part of a window. Normally that's it, I would just save the image and use it wherever it's intended to go.

This time, however, I thought I'd better do something about an ftp address and, instead of saving, Greenshot has several other options on offer, including its own little editor. I chose that and immediately there's a toolbar with various things I may or may not want to do to the image. The coolest is called Obfuscate and it pixelates whatever area you specify. Love that.

You'll almost want to take screen prints with this tool just so you can obfuscate!


Webtools; notes on Google Forms now available

For some reason I missed out notes I'd written on how to set up a survey using Google's brilliant Forms.

So that's there now - here's the direct link.




Monday, 31 December 2012

New web tools site - lots of new links and notes

Web

I have just updated and completely revised the webtools site for teachers, students and, well, anyone really.

Lots of new additions and I have included some notes and suggested use decsriptions for a range of tools which will also be featured on the LSIS Excellence Gateway soon. (I have provided content - but not the design - for a Third Sector toolkit that will be hosted there).

If anyone has any more ideas just let me know. I'm sure I've missed plenty and, of course, new ones are appearing every week now which I'll try and keep up with.



Thursday, 18 October 2012

Apps²

A colleague has just shared this infographic that she found. My first thought was OK, that's interesting, a bit out of date but nice to see someone promoting use of some of these tools which, of course, is what I spend an inordinate amount of my time doing.

Click to enlarge

Then I had second and third and fourth thoughts. 

2. It's really a bit of a mess. 
I'll simply have to do something about that and redo it in rather smarter fashion, maybe adding some much needed links too. 

3. There are some quite important tools missing. 
OK, it may be old so I can remove some and add some. 

4. There are quite a few instances where lines need to go in more than one direction, tools that can be good for several elements. 
That can be included in the reworked version.

It was the fifth thought that really stuck, though: 
5. Wouldn't it be great if we could start in one application and stay in that application with everything we might need being something like an app within that application. 
Sort of app².

Ideas, drafts etc. go in and out of this central application. Some you discard. Some go straight in. Some need a bit of editing first and then get embedded. The whole end product, or 'content' as this graphic calls it, is a combination of various elements: text, images, data, media and any other dimension that I've missed out that can be shared, linked to, embedded, displayed or even printed in part.

I don't quite know where I'm going with this but thanks to Shri for getting me off on yet another journey in this e-learning world!